A STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE ANALYSIS ON BAHAU PEOPLE’S MYTH OF BATOQ AYAU

Main Article Content

Jonathan Irene Sartika Dewi Max

Abstract




The Myth of Batoq Ayau is one of popular folklores of Dayak Bahau People in East Kalimantan. The narrative is first examined using narrative theory to find out the way plot is structured. Secondly, the binary oppositions which arranged to build the meaning of the myth are unveiled by a structuralist approach. This research is conducted with a qualitative descriptive methodology. It is found that the myth develops a plot of tragedy where a new equilibrium is settled in the end. The binary oppositions are examined from three elements of narrative which are the characters, the conflicts, and the setting. Eight binary opposition pairs develop the meaning of the myth. They are Safety-Danger, Outsider-Insider, Sturdiness- Defenselessness, Physical-Psychological, Cautiousness-Negligence, Life-Death, and Low-High. Thus, the meaning delivered myth of Batoq Ayau still has a relevancy to the condition of human beings today where being vigilance to the environment issues is truly needed.




Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Max, J. I. S. D. (2021). A STRUCTURAL NARRATIVE ANALYSIS ON BAHAU PEOPLE’S MYTH OF BATOQ AYAU. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Seni (Sesanti), 350–366. Retrieved from https://eprosiding.fib-unmul.id/index.php/sesanti/article/view/84
Section
Articles

References

Abrams, M. H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th ed. London: Thomson Learning.

AMZ, R.H.Y, et. al. (2019). Dongeng Dayak Bahau: Sastra Lisan Warisan Leluhur. Jakarta: Penerbit Kota Tua.

Adepati, M. K. & Samanik. “Narrative Structure of the Minds of Billy Milligan Novel and Split Film.” 2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, vol. 2, 2018, pp.440-444. Accessed 20 Mar. 2020 from: https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/3569/3395.

Belareq, B. B. (2006). Upacara Adat Dangai Bahau Busaang Kayaan Mekaam.

Campbell, J. (1988) The Power of Myth. New York: Doubleday.

Cortazzi, M. (1993) Narrative Analysis. London: Routledge.

Danesi, M. (2004) Messages, Signs, and Meanings: A Basic Textbook in Semiotics and Communication Theory. 3th ed., Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.

Doniger, W. (2009). Claude Levi-Strauss’s Theoretical and Actual Approaches to Myth. The Cambridge Companion to Levi-Strauss, edited by Boris Wiseman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Drabble, M. (2000). The Oxford Companion to English Literature. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frye, N. (2000). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. London: Princeton University Press.

Hawkes, T. (2003) Structuralism and Semiotics. London: Routledge.

Herman, et. al. (2005) Handbook of Narrative Analysis. University of Nebraska Press.

Kenan, S. R. (1983) Narrative Fiction. London: Routledge.

Leeming, D. A. (1990). The World of Myth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Malinowski, B. (1962). Myth in Primitive Psychology. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Morford & Lenardon. (2003) Classical Mythology. 7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nensilianti. “Kategorisasi dan Karakteristik Mitos Masyarakat Bugis dan Makassar.” Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, vol. 12, no. 1, 2019, pp. 53-70.

doi: 10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7240.

Plummer, K. (2019). Narrative Power: The Struggle for Human Value. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Progoff, I. (1972). Jung’s Psychological and Its Social Meaning. London: Routledge.

Puckett, K. (2016). Narrative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on Research Methods: Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Reseach in Nursing and Health, vol. 23, pp. 334-34.

doi=10.1.1.461.4974&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Segal, R. A. (2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Selden, et al. (2005). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. 5th ed., London: Pearson Education Ltd.

Sims, M. C. & Stephens, M. (2005). Living Folklore. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Taum, Y.Y. (2018). The Problem ff Equilibrium in The Panji Story: A Tzvetan Todorov’s Narratology Perspective. International Journal of Humanity Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018, pp. 99-100. Accessed 15 Mar. 2020 from https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2018.020110.

Todorov, T. (1971). The Two Principles of Narratives. Diacritics, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 37-44.

Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Young, J. (2013). The Philosophy of Tragedy from Plato to Žižek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Young, T. (2008). Studying English Literature: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press.